The ART of Collaboration (2)

There is a desire to develop more effective knowledge sharing and a culture of collaboration in most organisations, but little recognition of what this means in terms of staff development and overcoming barriers to change. The enormous growth of social media tools and social/professional networks over the past few years has created new opportunities and new challenges for people and organisations that want to embrace this dynamic world of social interaction and fluid knowledge flows. However, It is not widely recognised that collaboration and knowledge sharing are skills and practices that rarely get taught. It’s something we may learn on the job in a hit or miss fashion. Some people are natural at it. Others struggle to understand it.

I’ve previously blogged on this topic, but I wanted to focus specifically on this thing we call “collaboration” in this post. First of all, what do we mean by “collaboration”. Here’s a definition:

Collaboration is when individuals or groups work together, combining their strengths and negating weaknesses to accomplish a set of goals

I think the important point about this definition is that the outcomes are more likely to be amplified when working together as opposed to individually.

Collaboration is at the heart of social networking and the bedrock for effective knowledge sharing. More and more organisations have recognised that encouraging collaboration between staff, stakeholders and customers will enable co-design, co-production and opportunities for innovation to emerge.

So what are the attributes of a good collaborator?

1. Authenticity

This is not just ‘identity’, in terms of an on-line profile. It means, “are you who you say you are”? Are you truthful, genuine and sincere? Do you provide relevant attributions to your sources? Do you cite the origins of your content? Are you indeed a human being? Not to be confused with a Bot or a clever Artificial Intelligence application (don’t laugh even experts can be fooled. See the Turing Test).

2. Recognition (or Reward)

One thing that academics do appear to agree on is that a key influencer for good collaborative behaviour is recognition or reward. This does not have to be monetary reward, or gaining power and influence though promotion. In many cases it is simply being recognised as someone who has demonstrated knowledge or expertise on a particular topic. For the truly networked individual, to be acknowledged as an “expert” by your peers carries far more weight than some transient, short-term financial reward. I would go so far as to argue that collaborative behaviour that is driven mostly or entirely by financial reward will only be very superficial and is not sustainable in the long term.

3. Trust

To my mind, the most important characteristic, and the most ephemeral, since it’s not something that can be easily measured or evaluated. Trust relies on believing that a person will behave reasonably and will do what he or she says.

We establish trust with the people we engage with by the way we behave and how they reciprocate. Feelings of empathy with another person may also play a part. Establishing trust with people in an online network is more difficult than for face-to-face encounters, where we can tap into emotional signals and evaluate body language. However, trust, once established, can be just as strong for on-line engagement as it is for real-life. In fact, there are many people in my on-line networks that I’ve never met; yet I trust them more than some of the people I meet from day to day.

4. Passion

Enthusiasm, commitment, devotion to a cause or belief – all of these define ‘passion’. These are strong, emotional characteristics that provide the motivation for collaboration.  Having passion for something (or someone?) gives a meaning to our actions and, in the context of collaboration, connects the authenticity, recognition and trust characteristics. Long before there were social networks, hobbyists would gather to share their passion, whether it is photography, model making, knitting or gardening.  Such clubs and organisations are founded on the principles of sharing of ideas and techniques to support learning and improvement.  But the other (and arguably more significant) factor is that members of these gatherings also crave recognition for something they have achieved. This is not dissimilar to the recognition we wish to achieve through online collaboration, where knowledge or expertise can be recognised by our peers.

The diagram below shows how all of these characteristics combine together to form what I believe is the ideal model for collaborative behaviour. My only surprise from the research I undertook for this topic (admittedly not exhaustive) was how few references there were to “Trust”, and no references at all to “Authenticity”. Two of my key characteristics. However, most pundits seem to agree on ‘Recognition” as one of the fundamental characteristics.

ART of Collaboration

I’ve emphasised the acronym ART in this post and in the diagram above because I do feel that effective collaboration is an “art” in the true sense of the word, i.e. a skill that is learnt through practice. I wonder….are you practising this ART enough?

About Steve Dale

Stephen Dale is both an evangelist and practitioner in the use of Web 2.0 technologies and Social Media applications to support personal development and knowledge sharing. He has a deep understanding of how systems and technology can be used to support learning and facilitate smarter working, where connections and conversations are the key to self-development and creativity within the organisation.
This entry was posted in collaboration, Knowledge Management, Social Computing and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to The ART of Collaboration (2)

  1. nick milton says:

    Steve, given your definition, do you distinguish between collaboration and teamwork?

  2. Steve Dale says:

    Hi Nick,

    I don’t think there is any significant distinction between collaboration and teamwork, except that collaboration as part of a team should be a lot easier. You would normally know your team members, so Authenticity and Trust should be far easier to establish.

    What do you think?

  3. Jean-Louis Janssens says:

    Totally agree with your point of view. For ten years, we have developed a training course for facilitators of community of practice. The core of the training: create and maintain trust among members. The results are very positive.

  4. Steve Dale says:

    Thanks for your comments Jean-Louis. Would be interested in hearing more about your training course for CoP facilitators.

  5. Geoff Okao says:

    Hi Steve.

    I think that an ingredient in collaboration is the recognition, respect and appreciation that cultural differences could influence the collaborative effort both positively and negatively. Together with the elements you have discussed, I think that for individuals to fully embrace the virtual working paradigm, a keen awareness of cultural differences can promote better collaboration and productivity.

  6. Steve Dale says:

    Thanks Geoff, a very good point. Appreciation and recognition of cultural differences is becoming increasingly important as we all become far more globally connected. I think its also one of the most misunderstood facets of collaboration. You really need to experience a culture in order to understand it; something that’s often no possible for what is usually a virtual relationship. But I agree with you, its another key facet of effective collaboration.

  7. Pingback: My links of the week (weekly) « lateral thinking

  8. Pingback: Scientific Recipe For A Comfortable Collaboration - Business Conjunctions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>